Marcel lefebvre handwriting analysis

The progressivists were smart enough to understand that the messages of Our Lady of Fatima could destroy their plans that have been on the drawing board since the middle of the 19th century.

Marcel lefebvre handwriting analysis

July 21, Dr. The General Chapter of the SSPX has issued its concluding statement, which clearly is meant to identify the next twelve years of the life of the SSPX with one of the most thrilling anti-Modernist moments of the SSPX, the Declaration in November in which Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre reacted to the Modernism which he experienced coming from the mouths of the ecclesial visitors who came to the Econe seminary.

In the final text the superiors of the SSPX rally the faithful to the fight for Christ the King and His Dominion over All Men and identifies its mission as preserving the priesthood which has as its focus the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

None of this savors of a meat of an unbranded wether! Pray for the best! Let us see how the "authority," "even the highest in the hierarchy," responds to this.

marcel lefebvre handwriting analysis

Obviously there will be no "deal" for the next 12 years. The final statement of the General Chapter is below. Below that I have included the entirety of the Marcel lefebvre handwriting analysis Declaration.

This we shall do until such time that the true light of Tradition dissipates the darkness obscuring the sky of Eternal Rome. The Society is enlivened by the same sentiments as Saint Pius X, its patron saint: The interests of God shall be Our interest, and for these We are resolved to spend all Our strength and Our very life.

Hence, should anyone ask Us for a symbol as the expression of Our will, We will give this and no other: For this reason the Society continues to work for the triumph of Christ the King and invites all souls of good will to join in this stirring supernatural endeavor.

Sorrowful and immaculate heart of Mary, pray for us who have recourse to thee. We refuse, on the other hand, and have always refused to follow the Rome of neo-Modernist and neo-Protestant tendencies which were clearly evident in the Second Vatican Council and, after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it.

All these reforms, indeed, have contributed and are still contributing to the destruction of the Church, to the ruin of the priesthood, to the abolition of the Sacrifice of the Mass and of the sacraments, to the disappearance of religious life, to a naturalist and Teilhardian teaching in universities, seminaries and catechectics; a teaching derived from Liberalism and Protestantism, many times condemned by the solemn Magisterium of the Church.

Is it not this that the Holy Father is repeating to us today? And if we can discern a certain contradiction in his words and deeds, as well as in those of the dicasteries, well we choose what was always taught and we turn a deaf ear to the novelties destroying the Church.

This Reformation, born of Liberalism and Modernism, is poisoned through and through; it derives from heresy and ends in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is therefore impossible for any conscientious and faithful Catholic to espouse this Reformation or to submit to it in any way whatsoever.

The only attitude of faithfulness to the Church and Catholic doctrine, in view of our salvation, is a categorical refusal to accept this Reformation. That is why, without any spirit of rebellion, bitterness or resentment, we pursue our work of forming priests, with the timeless Magisterium as our guide.

We are persuaded that we can render no greater service to the Holy Catholic Church, to the Sovereign Pontiff and to posterity. That is why we hold fast to all that has been believed and practiced in the faith, morals, liturgy, teaching of the catechism, formation of the priest and institution of the Church, by the Church of all time; to all these things as codified in those books which saw day before the Modernist influence of the Council.A careful scientific analysis and serious testimony Just as each one has a particular way of walking, gesturing, laughing, walking, etc.

so also the handwriting has a peculiar series of tendencies and features that differentiate it from others, Begoña Slocker explains.

Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling (German: [ˈʃɛlɪŋ]; 27 January – 20 August ), later (after ) von Schelling, was a German caninariojana.comrd histories of philosophy make him the midpoint in the development of German idealism, situating him between Johann Gottlieb Fichte, his mentor in his early years, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, his former university roommate.

Unfortunately, certain members of the SSPX leadership have not shown the same prudence, generosity, and clear vision that the Society's founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, had.

But the safety valves worked, and the SSPX resolved this particular problem internally, at least for the time being. May 03,  · Was the true Third Secret of Fatima finally revealed during the th anniversary year?

There is strong evidence that can support that it was finally disclosed, although we cannot be % sure since numerous false reports regarding the Third Secret were issued. Marcel Lefebvre And, also, we have here a letter from Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to Bishop de Castro Mayer asking him to consecrate a bishop as his successor since recourse could not be had to a Rome that was Catholic.

Can the investigation include handwriting analysis? If so the following should be looked at: the Declaration in November in which Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre reacted to the Modernism which he experienced coming from the mouths of the ecclesial visitors who came to the Econe seminary.

In the final text the superiors of the SSPX rally the. Apologia pro Marcel Lefebvre: Chapter 8: The War of Attrition