Death penalty debate pro

The following article is an instance in which such a disclaimer was requested. Resources directed toward this form of selective, legitimized killing of human beings are not available for crime prevention methodologies proven for their effectiveness.

Death penalty debate pro

Check new design of our homepage! Pro Death Penalty Arguments If you are finding it difficult to decide whether you should support the practice of death penalty or oppose it, you should go through this compilation of pro death penalty arguments often put forth by those who feel that it's a necessity for a crime-free society.

OpinionFront Staff I support the death penalty because I believe, if administered swiftly and justly, capital punishment is a deterrent against future violence and will save other innocent lives. Bush When the President of the United States speaks, the whole world listens, which is exactly what happened when former President George W.

Bush spoke in the favor of death penalty. A controversial issue nonetheless, death penalty or capital punishment has left the world divided. On one side, we have people armed with pro death penalty arguments who argue that it's a necessity if we are to ensure that a crime-free society prevails.

Harsh punishments

On the other, we have people who believe that it is against humanity and thus, should be abolished. Fast Facts If death penalty statistics are to be believed, around 90 percent of the total death sentences come from the Asian countries. The data collected by Amnesty International reveals that 22 countries carried out death sentences in China has the highest execution rate in the world though the data is not revealed officiallyfollowed by Iran and Iraq.

In the United States, capital punishment is deemed legal in 32 states. Since1, executions have been carried out in the country, with TexasOklahomaand Virginia accounting for more than half of the cases.

Arguments in Favor of Death Penalty So, is the death penalty really a necessity for crime-free society? Does this form of punishment really serve the purpose? If its pros and cons are weighed, do its pros have an edge over its cons?

Death penalty debate pro

If the arguments put forth by people in its support are to be believed, it's surely necessary if we are to do away with some of the most heinous crimes that we often hear about. It Acts as a Deterrent The foremost argument put forth by pro death penalty activists is that it serves as a deterrent for others.

The fear of death affects everybody; criminals are no exception. If they realize that committing a serious crime will take them to the gallows, they are bound to think twice before acting.

This argument is supported by statistics which reveal that the crime rate in countries where this form of punishment exists is far less compared to those countries where it has been abolished.

Abolitionists may refute these claims and argue that there is no 'empirical evidence' to suggest that the same acts as a deterrent. But then, there is no 'empirical evidence' to suggest that it doesn't act as a deterrent either. Maybe it doesn't act as a deterrent for hardened criminals or for those who act in passion, but it is most likely to act as a deterrent for those who plan a murder after carefully taking into account all the possibilities.

It's Also About Justice With criminal acts, like homicide, rape, etc. In most of these cases, the criminals are no first-time offenders to get deterred by the fear of capital punishment.

Death penalty debate pro

If they have committed a crime, they have to be brought to justice. Those in the support of this practice also argue that a person who kills someone doesn't have the right to live. Once again, abolitionists will be quick to retort with the Gandhian quote, An eye for eye will make the whole world blind, which is sad, because it undermines the difference between the convict and victim.

It is perhaps easier to forget someone who is already dead, doesn't matter if he or she was a victim of a heinous crime. The Myth of It Being Costly Is it justified that a person who has committed a serious crime lives in a prison with all the basic amenities at the cost of taxpayers money?

The cost incurred on housing inmates who are sentenced life imprisonment goes into millions. By sentencing these convicts to death, this money, which will be otherwise spent on their leisure, can be used for a better purpose.

Besides, most prisons are already filled to the capacity. By sentencing convicts to life, we will only put more pressure on the treasury.Throughout the United States, police are being laid off, prisoners are being released early, the courts are clogged, and crime continues to rise.

The death penalty is a warning, just like a lighthouse throwing its beams out to sea. We hear about shipwrecks, but we do not hear about the ships the lighthouse guides safely on their way. RACE: Black = 26 Latino = 7 Native American = 1 Asian = 1 White = 28 GENDER: Males = 62 Females = 1 TOTAL = 63 Since the reinstatement of the federal death penalty in , 78 defendants have been sentenced to death of whom 3 have been executed and 12 have been finally removed from death row.

Three other defendants have had a jury recommendation for death, but no death sentence by the judge. Board Threads Posts Last Post; Main Pro Death Penalty Board - 3 Viewing. Both sides of the discussion are welcome here. Moderators: Charlene, Kay Sub-board: Historic Death Penalty Topics 1, In light of today’s news that the pope has “changed the Catechism of the Catholic Church about the death penalty, saying it can never be sanctioned,” we are reprinting this as a reference point for concerned Catholics.

–SS, 8/2/ This statement, which moved the pope’s position from. Death penalty pros and cons have always been a matter of debate. While many are in favor of capital punishment, others still show compassion and mercy on the criminals, thinking that a human still resides in the monster that killed many souls.

DPIC | Death Penalty Information Center